Analysis Summary of the movie 12 Angry Men using group dynamics Essay

Analysis heavyset of the movie 12 Angry Men using congregation dynamics - Essay ExampleWhen the group of jurors first meet during the orientation descriptor, they are chatting, making jokes and talking about a random magnetic inclination of things such as their jobs and things they could be doing instead of being in a jury room. The orientation phase is characteristic of acquaintance, positive attitudes on similarities and clarity. At this stage, the group is only creating opinions, nonhing intense. (Robbins, 1974, para 4). There is a general feeling for most of the jurors that this will be a quick case, nonhing intense. However when the old geezer of the jury juror number one takes an initial vote the tone is set for a tenacious drawn process and the development of the group dynamics. In the initial vote eleven jurors have already declared the defendant is shamefaced. Only Juror number eight votes not guilty on the causa of reasonable doubt. It is never easy to be part of the minority because it goes against our natural desire to be evaluate (Johnson, 2007, p. 153). Out of this minority, the true leader begins to emerge and group formation begins. Positioning of power becomes apparent as the jurors biases, backgrounds and personalities begin to unfold.The jurys deliberation begins when the first vote is taken. Several jurors observe others voting and they hassle their hands. It is only juror number eight who has the courage to stand alone and has strong convictions that the defendant is not guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Questions arise as they begin to examine the different parts of the testimony. These testimonies were not initially considered in the first vote. Normative influence by juror eight begins to revert from guilty to not guilty. Through the process, personalities unfold and the pressure of social influence is clear among the jurors. Team members have to manufacture a new social identity and forfeit their own in order for a aggroup t o be built. (Levi, 2014, p.